Victim of overflow of great players: Afellay

October 15th, 2008 | By: Jan | 34 Comments »

Kaboom! That’s the sound of a shot of Afellay’s right foot, hitting the ball into the net at training. Like a canonball the leather is fired away.

If something is remarkable about the Afellay this season compared to last season it is his hunger for goals. Every shot he fires has venom, as if he hits the ball with bigger shoes. He scored four goals in four games, which is more than the whole former season.

“Actually, I do hit the ball different, yeah,” confirms Afeally. “It’s a matter of practice. I make extra hours every day. I learned the technique years back, from Willy van der Kuylen and I keep on repeating and practicing and it works.”

He never started a season better than this one. Last Saturday, he came onto the pitch when the game was played, but whenever he touched the ball a wave of excitement went through the stadium.

“It went well, yeah,” the midfielder admits. But, will this result in a starting position? Probably not. Afellay is victim of the options Van Marwijk has for the midfield position. There’s Raf van der Vaart, Sneijder, Robin van Persie, Ryan Babel, Dirk Kuyt and the injured Arjen Robben as well, all jockeying for a position behind the striker.

Being in the best form ever, but being a sub at Oranje: Afellay will have to live with it.

“There is enormous competition, I know. What I need to do is show myself constantly. At the training and when I do get time to play.”

His choice to play for Oranje was a courageous one. He could have chosen to play for Morocco, he would have been the playmaker without a doubt. But, he wanted to reach for the stars, despite the enormous pressure from the Moroccan community.

But, when will that courage be rewarded. His main competitors Van Persie, Sneijder and Van der Vaart are all around 25 years old. Will Afellay aim to become even better or will he forever stay in their shadow? Like Wim Kieft and Marco van Basten? And how will Afellay handle that when his status in Europe grows? A transfer to a major player is only a matter of time, really.

“Coming on in the second half requires a different sort of concentration than playing from the start,” says Afellay. “In the game you settle into some rhythm. When you come in later, you’ll have to find that existing rhythm and you have to force something in a short time. That’s what I aim for. It’s different than my status at PSV, but I learn a lot still at Oranje. Every day.”

Against Iceland, he walked past opponents as if they weren’t there. “Against Norway, that will be different. Norway has a tough team. Strong and sturdy. They have quality players too, with lots of experience. Carew, Risse, Iversen… These guys have seen a lot in football. I hope to be of value, we’ll see in what way I can manage to do that.”



Related Posts



Subscribe
 

rss icon Netherlands World Cup RSS Feed

Print
Print this article
Share
del.icio.us:Victim of overflow of great players: Afellay digg:Victim of overflow of great players: Afellay newsvine:Victim of overflow of great players: Afellay reddit:Victim of overflow of great players: Afellay fark:Victim of overflow of great players: Afellay Y!:Victim of overflow of great players: Afellay stumbleupon:Victim of overflow of great players: Afellay

Comments

Displaying the most recent 25 comments from a total of 34 comments.

Read the rest of the comments

Username By Bart | October 15th, 2008 at 3:10 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Affelay’s shot was not inches past the post more like 3 feet. o__0

Posted from Canada Canada

cornercorner
Username By mario | October 15th, 2008 at 3:42 pm
top comment
cornercorner

We have never had such a bright beginning in a qualification process and we have had many injured players but we goy quality on the bench. I am very happy that van Bommel scored, he is a leader and he deserves his place in Oranje and we lacked a player like him in Euro 2008 because neither De Zeeuw, De Jong, Engelaar or anybody are close to his level and leadership.

If he has been benched at Bayern is very strange decision by Klinsmann but things are not going well at Bayern this year and last year when they were champions one of their best players was van Bommel.

Now at Oranje things look great and although the level of play hasn´t been the best in this kind of games the only thing that matters is getting a result. South Africa seems pretty close to the Netherlands already…

cornercorner
Username By goose | October 15th, 2008 at 3:52 pm
top comment
cornercorner

here are my notes:

vdSar; 6,5 ; not much to do, respect for everything he has done for Oranje

Marcellis; 4 ; it all was a bit too much for Marcellis, he still has a long way to go before hes at international level, still has many years to improve ofcourse

Ooijer; 6 ; played ok, nothing special, never looks very confident in defense and certainly not in building up

Matijsen; 5 ; is just not a very good defender, looks small and slow and like the rest of defense no use in building up

vBronckhorst; 6 ; played ok, is beginning to look a bit old, played better in the second half

Kuijt; 6,5 ; played very poor in the first half, played a much better second half after switching to the central striker position

vBommel ; 4 ; really isnt in good form, had some amazing bad passes, didnt looks to intelligent..great goal btw

vdVaart ; 5 ; again really could make the difference, isnt really the leader in the team like Sneijder, worked hard tough

Sneijder (76) ; played not enough minutes to really make his mark, hes the man the team should be build around

deZeeuw ; 2 ; he played so poor it almost made me cry .. this guy adds nothing to the team (he reminds me of Landzaat), everything he did was poor

Babel ; too bad he was kicked out of the game…pretty poor challange by the norwegian guy

Affelay (26) ; 6 ; didnt really play well but sparks of his talent showed, almost scored but made too many mistakes

Huntelaar ; 2 ; his worst game in an Oranje shirt imo, dont remember seeing him do anything that worked, always offside, never a good control, just shit

vPersie ; 6 ; not a special performance, played on the right hand side after Kuyt went to the striker position

All in all another pretty poor performance but its 3 points in the bag, looks like were almost qualified after only 3 games.
Huntelaar was pathetic and after Kuyt switched to the striker position thing were much better.
Defense still looks not very confident and the lack of build-up-qualities is frightening; it leaves us with long balls from the goalie, thats a real waste with all the great midfield players we have.

Posted from Netherlands Netherlands

cornercorner
Username By Rob | October 15th, 2008 at 3:53 pm
top comment
cornercorner

It wasn’t a great performance, on the balance of play Norway deserved at least a draw and probably a win. Points:

Marcellis – looked good but too poor in the air to play centre half for Oranje, I’d prefer him at right back. He can learn his trade there now.

Van Bommel – got the goal, took it well, ran his socks off, I still hate him.

Babel – got hacked to pieces with no repercussions. Joke.

Van Persie – was quality when he came on.

Van der Vaart – went missing for most of the game.

Same old Oranje as last time around qualifying – the opposition defence sits deep and there’s no penetration at all. Huntelaar looked isolated and no-one had any ideas. Didn’t create any clear cut chances until Norway were chasing the game. Norway were more dangerous on the counter and had more chances before they went 1-0 down. It’s an away win, which is great, but it was a disappointing performance against a very average Norway side. The Oranje defence did pretty well though for once, and stood up against a tall Norway attack.

Posted from Japan Japan

cornercorner
Username By Rob | October 15th, 2008 at 3:55 pm
top comment
cornercorner

@goose – sure, but remember that Norway were chasing the game when Kuyt went up top. Huntelaar’s main problem was that they were able to sit back against him and he didn’t have anyone supporting him to play off. Van der Vaart didn’t help him enough by getting forward.

Posted from Japan Japan

cornercorner
Username By goose | October 15th, 2008 at 4:01 pm
top comment
cornercorner

just think Huntelaar played very poor, part of his quality should be to hold the ball up front so the midfield players can move up behind him, his lack of control stopped that from happening, i do agree that vdVaart did liitle to help out Huntelaar but i guess he was to busy cleaning up the mess deZeeuw and vBommel left in midfield

Posted from Netherlands Netherlands

cornercorner
Username By 3ric | October 15th, 2008 at 4:29 pm
top comment
cornercorner

@goose: I think you’re a bit harsh about De Zeeuw. I thought he did decent today, he covered lots of ground, won tackles, and added muscle to the midfield. Okay, his passing is piss poor and he add nothing on the offensive end, but in all fairness he did what he is asked to (i.e. protect the back line). I’d still take De Jong any day over De Zeeuw, though. Van Bommel responded very well today, miles better than the last game vs. Iceland. I’ve been very critical to him, but if he plays like he did today, it’s a huge advantage to Oranje.

Huntelaar was shockingly bad. I think Bert might want to keep Ruud’s phone # handy. We can’t go to South Africa without deadly goalscorer.

cornercorner
Username By Michel-Olivier | October 15th, 2008 at 4:41 pm
top comment
cornercorner

bring back ruud horsey-face(ray hudson) or call nordin amrabat and frank demouge

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By mario | October 15th, 2008 at 4:53 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Rob, are u van Basten´s brother or is he related to you?

cornercorner
Username By finnster01 | October 15th, 2008 at 6:54 pm
top comment
cornercorner

OK, so I guess Hereeveen will be looking for a new coach soon. The country and some of the papers are already looking for heads to roll, and coach Sollied is the natural replacement (if he wants the job, I wouldn’t. Hereenveen is much more interesting)

A very average game, by two very average teams. Oranje has the quality to win on a bad day, which is always the sign of a good team. Norway should have taken their chances and won or at least got a draw, but didn’t, which is the sign of a very bad team.

At least we can now focus the attention on WC2010 and try to get this team (Oranje) functional over the next 2 years, because it sure needs it. This level will not get them very far in South Africa. Defense is extremely worrysome. Oranje play quality opposition like Brazil, Spain or Argentina right now, it will be a disaster. Even Norway exposed them on the counter which is pretty scary in my book. DeZeeuw is useless. Hunter looks like he doesn’t care and is out of it at the moment. He needs to go to a bigger club ASAP and play aginst the big boys on a regular basis. Eresdivise does not cut it and help his development nor his confidence. Somebody please convince EVDS that he still has 2 more years left in the tank. His calmness and confidence clearly helped the back 4.

This level is good enough to take Oranje to Johannesburg, but then what? Good news is there are still 2 years to fix it. Right now it certainly looks more like the team that lost to Russia than the team that butchered Italy and France.

cornercorner
Username By darius | October 15th, 2008 at 7:15 pm
top comment
cornercorner

I disagree that oranje “butchered” italy and france. Those teams dominated the game and chances, but oranje got on the counter noicely to win, but hardly butchered them.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By finnster01 | October 15th, 2008 at 7:21 pm
top comment
cornercorner

What does a butcher do? He doesn’t play with his prey before the slaughter, like a cat plays with a mouse. He kills it off fast and efficient.

Oranje butchered Italy and France. No better way to describe those two games. End of story.

cornercorner
Username By Michel-Olivier | October 15th, 2008 at 7:41 pm
top comment
cornercorner

i agree finnster

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By darius | October 15th, 2008 at 7:54 pm
top comment
cornercorner

NOt really, but I love you Dutchies spirit! Classic stuff. I’ll have to check out this site a bit . Great writing by Jan also. As for the italy and france games, lets remember them properly: the other sides had the majority of chances, of good chances. Only VDS kept you from LOSING both games. Lets be clear here. Great counter-attacking, wonderful play by many of your players, but if those teams take their chances as they would if they had they been in form, dutch would have maybe 1 point from those 2 games. But you all took your chances and converted deadly, whcih is what football is all about so hats off! But not in 2010 unless you draft some guys who can defend. But are there any in holland??

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By Jan | October 15th, 2008 at 8:38 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Hi Darius, thanks for the compliments :-) .

We don’t have great defenders at the moment, but some youngsters are coming on board. I feel Bommel should move back a line. But not everyone agrees with me.

I read in that match report as posted here that Vorm played vs Iceland? Wow! We all missed that eh?

cornercorner
Username By Jan | October 15th, 2008 at 8:42 pm
top comment
cornercorner

On Italy and France: we scored the first goal in those matches and then at that level you allow the opponent to try and take the game to you. That’s how it is. And that’s why Italy got their chances. If they had scored first, they wouldn’t have proceeded like that.

When you win these games (against big nations) with three goals difference, I agree with Finn: you’ve taken them to the cleaners.

Sure, Sar saved some balls, but that’s why he’s there.

The goal scoring against France in particular was just top class stuff. Is it luck? Or is it class? Maybe both? Either way, the end result is the end result :-)

cornercorner
Username By Caleb | October 15th, 2008 at 9:35 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Definitely butchered Italy and France, there’s no other way to describe beating them by a three goal difference. And I hope no one has the idea to suggest that Italy and France were the better teams in those games, because that would be absolutely ridiculous.

cornercorner
Username By darius | October 15th, 2008 at 10:03 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Not really ridiculous. Jan, as for your scoring the first goal, and impacts first goals have on rhythym of games, I think you are right. However, lets remember-Holland was being outplayed early in both games prior to the surprise first goals. And only VDS kept it from being 1-0 to your opponents in both games. Dont underestimate his import to your wins. Anyway, I know no one on here will agree so its ok, but i do really like watching holland play usually. I think you all are top 3 in world ….outside your back 4. With that defense, you are top 10, but no better, and I think you all know that. But top 10 can still win it if the skies align properly!.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By mario | October 15th, 2008 at 10:32 pm
top comment
cornercorner

darius….get real!

cornercorner
Username By darius | October 15th, 2008 at 10:40 pm
top comment
cornercorner

i am right-not top3, but top 10. And you say “get real”????? you have maybe an outsized view of your team, like lots of fans. But its ok

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By Andrew | October 16th, 2008 at 6:41 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Darius,

I think you may have a point re: the France game. But not Italy; the Dutch were on top of the Italians from the start. Wasn’t until the Dutch led 2-0 at halftime (and could/should have been 3-0), that the Italians started playing their game. The Italians did have a good spell for the first part of the second half. Still, the Netherland’s good spell led to goals; the Italy’s didn’t, and 3-0 is a blow out at that level. With France I can’t argue with you through the first half. Kuyt got the early header, but the French put them back on their heels most of the rest of the half. Then on came Robben and Van Persie, both teams ran at each other; the Dutch were much better in the second half; 4-1 is a rout, and there was nothing deceiving about the scoreline.

That said, I think your assessment of top 10 is about right, but their winning is less about the sun and the stars alining than it is about sorting out the defense, and getting the players healthy. A midfield of De Jong and Van Bommel providing cover to allow VP, VDV, Sneijder, Robben, RVN (and yep, I’ll be shocked if he doesn’t join the team in SA if he keeps up his form)to do their thing—well, they’re a match for anybody on their day.

Andrew

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By Jan | October 16th, 2008 at 10:37 pm
top comment
cornercorner

we need to naturalize some Greek defenders :-)

cornercorner
Username By finnster01 | October 17th, 2008 at 12:20 am
top comment
cornercorner

“we need to naturalize some Greek defenders” : That would indeed help if we ever have to come from behind… :-)

cornercorner
Username By Jan | October 17th, 2008 at 2:08 am
top comment
cornercorner

HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAHAAAAAAA :-)

cornercorner
Username By goose | October 17th, 2008 at 3:47 am
top comment
cornercorner

hahaha finn;

Posted from Netherlands Netherlands

cornercorner


Comments are closed


 
Go to WCB Homepage




Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for World Cup Blog?
Email tips[at]worldcupblog[dot]org

Netherlands Club Football News

More Europe Blogs

Monthly Archives

closer
World Cup Blog