Ricky van Wolfswinkel: phenomenon

(parts of this piece are sourced from Mohamed Moallim, whom we thank…)
In Oranje’s long and exciting history there was always the role of “lone gunslinger”. The killer in the box. The goal-machine… Johnny Rep, Cor van der Gijp, Kees Kist, Wiem Kieft, Patrick Kluivert, Ruud van Nistelrooy, Peter Houtman, Ruud Geels, Johan Cruyff…
And when a new striker arrives, the whole country whispers his name. And before you know it his name is mentioned in relationship to Oranje.
Ricky van Wolfswinkel crashed onto the scene via Vitesse some years back and made headlines in particular for dating Johan Neeskens’ daughter. The lanky striker scored goals and made a surprising jump to FC Utrecht ( when a bit more patient could have resulted in a deal with Ajax or Feyenoord.
Utrecht had a swell season. Mertens, Strootman, Vorm, Van Wolfswinkel… all ready for a next step. Ricky was getting too expensive for the Dutch clubs and accepted – with his club Utrecht – a 5 mio euro deal to Sporting Lisbon. And the critics wondered…Portugal?? Where butchers are enlisted to stop artists… Will he succeed.
The whole Continent knows the answer as planes from Manchester, London and Eindhoven to the Portugal capital get overbooked…
Bert van Marwijk had to see the man on everyone’s lips for himself, even if it meant undertaking a rare scouting mission outside of The Netherlands.
As his flight landed in Lisbon, he held in his hand a ticket for Sporting’s Europa League tie against Lazio at the Estádio José Alvalade. His subject was said to be oblivious to his arrival, though given what was about to happen, you could be forgiven for suspecting he’d been tipped off.

The man Van Marwijk had come to see was Ricky van Wolfswinkel, and it didn’t take long for the striker to justify the hype. The Dutchman produced a moment of brilliance twenty minutes in; a sumptuous – if not audacious – flick with his left foot guiding the ball into the bottom corner past the diving Federico Marchetti.
“I’ve been trying to score like that, and this time it worked out very well,” he explained modestly after his side’s 2-1 victory.
He couldn’t have chosen a better time to pull it off, under the watchful gaze of the national team manager, and a man who had in the past spoken of the importance of his players expressing themselves and showing ingenuity. If this was a test of that, Van Wolfswinkel passed with flying colours.
A tentative start to life in Portugal, as well as the form of his competitors, has resulted in the 22-year-old not receiving the call from Van Marwijk so far this season.
The striker made his Oranje début last August in a friendly away to Ukraine, though that is his only cap to date. Yet a recent rich vein of form in front of goal may have the national coach thumbing through a Lisbon phone directory.
His summer move from Utrecht raised a few eyebrows. Van Wolfswinkel ended last season as FC Utrecht’s highest scorer with twenty goals – his best return in senior football to date. No stranger to transfer speculation in his time at Stadion Galgenwaard, his name often appeared on the grapevine alongside those of top Premier League clubs – notably Liverpool, Newcastle United and Tottenham. Although he was widely expected to make a move for pastures new, few could have envisaging his chosen destination.
“I can’t describe how happy I am,” Van Wolfswinkel said after completing his €5.0 million move.
“I can’t think of anything that isn’t good about this club. It’s very good for me: a club with a great coach, a great team and great fans. The stadium is spectacular. It’s at the same level as the best ones in Holland.”
After what he himself called “a slow start to the season” in which he often found himself on the substitute’s bench, the departure of Hélder Postiga opened the door to a run of form that has got people back home on Holland talking.
His first goal came 20 minutes after entering the field as a substitute against Paços de Ferreira. It was the all-important winner that sealed a memorable first win of the season for Sporting, who had at one stage been two goals behind.
Given football is largely a meritocracy, he was rewarded with a place in the starting XI for their following match, a Europa League tie with FC Zurich in which he again found the net.
To those familiar with the player’s strengths, what was happening wasn’t a surprise. Van Wolfswinkel is the quintessential poacher – with the right service, he will find the back of the net more often than not. Former Dutch international Jan Wouters, who worked with Van Wolfswinkel at FC Utrecht, stating simply that; “His biggest quality is scoring goals.”
It is Wouters’ former team-mate Marco van Basten who Van Wolfswinkel cites as his biggest idol, though he also looks up to FC Schalke striker and friend Klaas-Jan Huntelaar. As with Huntelaar, there’s an unfair stigma attached to Van Wolfswinkel suggesting that ‘all he does is score goals’. As if that’s a bad thing. Goals win football matches and bring glory, keep managers in their jobs and send the fans home happy.
But Van Wolfswinkel works for his goals. He times his runs well and finishes crisply, thanks in no small part to the hard hours he puts in on the training pitch. He’s not afraid to remind his marker that he’s there. Blessed with blistering pace, his acceleration is one his key facets, along with his aerial prowess.
And he wasn’t alone in making the move from Holland to Portugal over the summer. Stijn Schaars, former captain of AZ, signed for the club after talks broke down with PSV.
Schaars, like his compatriot and new club-mate, has also made a swift impact, slowly regaining the form that had some observers proclaiming a potential future national team captain.
Both Dutchmen were on the scoresheet in Sporting’s recent wins over Rio Ave and Vitória Setúbal, the latter being an exclusively Dutch affair.
Goals came to Van Wolfswinkel during his time in Dutch football – he struck 36 times in 78 appearances for Utrecht in his two years with the club – and the story is similar in Portugal.
Six goals in his last six appearances have not only got Van Marwijk scrambling for his passport, but have also lead to favourable comparisons with former club great Mario Jardel, who has nothing but praise for the Dutch marksman.
“He started very well. I hope he has the same success I had at Sporting. If he scores as many goals as I did. Then no doubt that Sporting will be champions.”
Comparisons have also been made with Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink, who also once plied his trade in Portugal with Boavista.
The former Chelsea man played in an era of great Dutch forward, and was therefore forced to battle against Dennis Bergkamp, Patrick Kluivert, Pierre van Hooijdonk and Ruud van Nistelrooy for his 23 caps.
The story is similar for Van Wolfswinkel, who was last week left out of the squad for Holland’s final Euro 2012 qualifiers against Moldova and Sweden despite his impressive recent form.
Robin van Persie, Huntelaar, Jeremain Lens and Luuk de Jong have been named ahead of him. But one thing’s for sure, the fact Van Marwijk made his way to Lisbon to see Van Wolfswinkel does suggest a bright future lies ahead – could it begin in Ukraine and Poland?

So who is Ricky van Wolfswinkel? Let’s ask him some questions:
How did you become a pro?
“I started when I was 10, with amateur club Woudenberg. Not much later Vitesse came and I went through the whole youth system. And I made it to the first team. Somehow, people think any football wants to play for a big club, and we do, but not immediately. I was an Utrecht fan when I was young and I loved playing for them. I didn’t mind staying longer in Holland and Utrecht gave me the best feeling. I knew a bigger club could come any day.”
Didn’t you want to play for Ajax or PSV or Feyenoord?
“Sure, but my asking price became too high for them. Ajax had a chance in the past but they didn’t strike and when Sporting came, I had to talk. I loved Portugal as a tourist and I got a great feeling with the club. I did talk with AZ ( Van Gaal) and Twente (McClaren) in the past, but they wanted to sign me in the winter stop and I didn’t want to leave the club like that.”
Best striker and best defender in the Dutch eredivisie?
“I admire Mads Junker. He’s with Roda. He’s smart, tough and great in his positioning. I can’t judge the current strikers at the top 3. Luuk de Jong is great too, but is he a striker? Nicky Kuiper is my favorite defender, but mainly because he’s my best buddy, haha. Douglas is a tough defender to play against.”
Best Dutch team?
“I think Twente. Most consistent, I think and I believe Adriaanse is a top coach. PSV has those periods of weakness. Feyenoord needs more time and Ajax is also inconsistent.”
Best stadium in Holland?
“Easy, the Feyenoord stadium in Rotterdam. Best atmosphere, best pitch.”
Who is your example as a striker?
“Van Basten and Huntelaar. I worked with Huntelaar at Oranje once and he’s a tremendous guy too. Not just a wonderful striker.”
And you have a famous father in law…
“I know, it’s weird. There is a link between Van Bommel and team manager Van Marwijk and when I played for Oranje B back in the day, Neeskens was my coach.
He lives in South Africa now, so I don’t see him too often. My girlfriend keeps in touch. I’m busy training and so is he, haha.”
Displaying the most recent 25 comments from a total of 57 comments.
Read the rest of the comments
Yeah,Wolfswinkel now,definitely.
But I think Castaignos has the potential to be better than Wolfswinkel and De Jong.
de jong!
Posted from
Bosnia And Herzegovina
As a Sporting supporter I say De Jong.
It is an interesting choice between De Jong and Wolfswinkel. Wolfswinkel is a better and more talented striker in my opinion. But he is phisically pretty weak,similar problem like it was with Van Persie in striker position. So that is where De Jong is better.
Wolfswinkel has improved on this point, phisically he is more strong now, his main weakness is on the air, he cannot beat any defender, lose every battle for the opponent, even on the headers he his shaky, never hits the goal, Wolfswinkel realy need to improve this point. Other thing that he can improve is the envolvement on the game, sometimes he is very static and when the team can’t product anything he completely desappears. Luuk de Jong have better technique, ball control, and good vision too, is because of that he plays as playmaker sometimes. Wolfswinkel is more a pure finisher, need just one oportunity to score one goal. De Jong is more a team player, hardworker, good skills, and also a good finisher. For now I still prefer Luuk over Ricky. Bert have the same opinion.
Luuk De Jong is a better footballer, Wolfswinkel is a better finisher.
Ricky is a whole lot like Huntelaar.. he is limited in the build-up, but he is very deadly when presented with goal-scoring opportunities. LDJ is Kuyt with slightly better techniques.. well-rounded, hard working, and can score.
I think both will eventually have their own places in Oranje. LDJ is what Van Marwijk need right now due to his versatility. He can drop back, playing as a support striker, or shift to the flank. He is also a typical ‘pinch-hitter’ because he wins a lot of headers and can hold the ball extremely well. Over time, I can see Van Wolfs growing as Huntelaar’s successor. He needs to keep working hard, and definitely add some muscles.
Castaignos.. well, let’s just leave it to the fact that he needs playing time for the right to be in the conversation.
Posted from
United States
Huntelaar
Luuke
Wolfswinkel
Castaignos
Posted from
Mexico
who is better to help defence?
I’m not really agree with anyone say ld jong is better footballer with better technique or ball control, his advantage is his physical present in he box with his header that is where BVM will use him in the near future, in addition it looks BVM takes young players early only when he has confidence, winning mentality, and hardworking, same as strootman. Wolfswinkel has slightly better technique and more finishing than de jong, he’s just had his confidence recently with his current club, while in BVM’s view, Castaignos is merely a unproven raw talent. It takes long time before BVM call him if he’s in charge until 2016.
Posted from
Australia
Inter is just about the worst place for a young player to be at this point. Correction: Italy is the worst place for a young player to be at any point.
talking about Castaignos, he actualy lost to Genero Zeefuik as first choice U21’s striker, anyone know how good is he?
Posted from
Australia
castaginos was sensational for
faynoord in last season.Everybody said he did a bad choice by agreeing on inter.Poor lad…the lad has enough potential to be a world class striker.i dont doubt that.But will he realise his potential?or will he develop?…lets wait and see…
Posted from
United Arab Emirates
Luuk de jong for me he is like a van hooidonk for me.A great guy with great physique with slightly better tecnique over kuyt.or a better version of kuyt.His physical presence will help us when we face protugal,italy…he should start as striker against both these teams or even aginst England and spain.
Posted from
United Arab Emirates
Van persie should get in to team as a left winger.and indircetly we will have three three strikers in persie,hunter and luuk.
we dont have a left winger now ,since afaleey is injured and who is goin to play there???.one thing is sure that wijnaldum will be a able and most suitable back up for roben in right wing.
Posted from
United Arab Emirates
tiju: luuk de jong is nothing like van hooijdonk. pi-air was all about his free kicks (see feyenoord’s amazing uefa cup campaign in 2001-2002)
Posted from
United Kingdom
so… it looks like Jan should write about Luuk De Jong too. LOL!
I tought (and still believe) that Van Wolfswinkel has better technique, definition and speed than De Jong.
But is right. If is you compare Huntelaar with Kuyt…
More precise will be this question:
1. You think Van Wolkswilkel has the potential to become in next years in a player better than Huntelaar?
2. You think Luuk de Jong has the potential to become in next years in a player better than Kuyt?
My big preocupation is who will be our next Sneijder and Robben!
I remember years ago I tought that Robben will be our next Overmars and that hapened.
Later, I tought Quincy and later Drenther will become in our next Robben….!
van Wolfswinkel will be our next great striker… you can see it in the way he scores his goals; just a pure striker
Posted from
Netherlands
According to how they trained and a light injury to vdWiel this is how Journalists see the line up against Swiss:
Stekelenburg; Boulahrouz, Heitinga, Mathijsen Braafheid; Van Bommel Strootman; Kuyt, Sneijder Van der Vaart; Van Persie.
Notice – No Wingers !
Posted from
Singapore
Well,thats a very bad line up.
But typical Van Marwijk line up,I wouldnt be surprised if those players will play tomorrow from the first minute.
His problem is he uses his strongest players,even if it is a friendly and even if he plays them out of their positions.
Castaignos coped so well at the age of 17 last year at Feyenoord. I think he has the mentality to cope at Inter as well. In fact he’s done very well in training, said by both the manager Ranieri and Sneijder. That’s how he got his playing time in his last game ahead of Milito.
Posted from
Canada
Boula is logical back up for wiel and this maybe a good time to get Boula playtime. While injured Pieters left us with no choice except Brafheid. Defensively Boula make us stronger on the right and Brafheid is less stronger on the left back position. Coincidently there wont be any winger or attacking wing backs (wiel/pieters) in these games. This maybe the first time for orange. Lets see if they can score against defensive switzerland.
Posted from
Australia
Last game vVaart played RW with tottenham he didn’t do well and he expressed his dislike with wing position, it maybe better to shift Kuyt to right, sneijder to the left, and vVaart in central position even if he has to drop back as holding, last time vVaart played badly in that position because of the absent of sneijder. I think it’ll work better this time eventhough still there is no player who csn create from wings. If it does not work, I think BVM will replace vVaart after 60mnt with Babel, or deJong for striker position and shift vPersie to the right.
My other alternative is playing one holding as 4 defensive minded backs and 2 holdings will be too much. Bommel/ Strootman partners with vVaart means Sneijder can play his best position, vPersie to the right, ldJong as a striker, I wish we have a better backup striker.
Posted from
Australia
I think Wolfswinkel and De Jong are simply different. Luuk de Jong is not fast, but lethal in the air and physically strong. De Jong can play midfield or shadowstriker too.
Wolf is fast. And a typical striker. No good elsewhere.
I think Wolf has the same “mind” as Makaay. Will score everywhere and no problems with penalties under pressure etc.
De Jong is like John Bosman. Good but not sensational like Huntelaar or Van Nistelrooy.
Castaignos is like many many players I’ve seen ( De Ridder? Van der Gun? Babel? Maduro? Biseswar? Drenthe?)
Great when they are in the youth teams but do they have it at top level?
With Castaignos, we simply don’t know yet….
Posted from
Australia
Comments are closed

World












@ Eduardo, V.Wolfswinkel. All the way. Luuk de Jong has never impressed me, and Castaignos is hardly in the position to be first choice.
Posted from
Netherlands