Post Match Reviews

June 11th, 2012 | by: Jan |

Comments(265)

Hello my friends…

Just to remind you all:

All the cool action is happening at:

http://dutchsoccersite.org

Polls, quizes, fantasy leagues, blogs, videos and what not!

I will write posts here still as there are many followers still here but the actuality is not longer here…

Come on down and check it out.

Well, we’ve seen the opening games in Group A and B. We’ve seen half of the field in action. We’ve seen dark horse Russia deliver. And favorites Oranje and Germany not deliver. But we also saw Germany win the three points!!

Not delivering, but winning. Very Germany.
Playing well and not winning. Very Dutch.

Where to start? After having had a couple of hours to let this sink in, I still stick to my guns. We didn’t play bad. If we had scored a couple in the first half, we would have easily won this 5-0 ( or 5-1).

So why didn’t we score? Why was Robben’s aim so far off? Why did Van Persie look like Bambi on ice for the first time. (Not the drug, but the frozen water). Why did Afellay didn’t see his team mates in the second half? Why can’t Van der Wiel cross a ball in?

Bert van Marwijk said it like this ( and I tend to buy this): “We were too eager. We wanted it too badly. The guys seemed to block.”

This might apply to Robin van Persie.

At the same time, Arjen Robben’s decision making was not always good. I don’t agree with the Robben bashing. He played well in the first half, linking up with Robin a lot and even trying not to be selfish. But in the second half, tactics went out of the window. And everyone wanted to break the deadlock.

The only player with an eye for the game and for team mates was Wes Sneijder.

Tactically the second half was a mess. What struck me, was that Sneijder didn’t have a lot of space to play in, as Afellay seemed to block the left wing and Willems (rightfully so) came there too on the overlap.

In the second half, Sneijder got more space to roam in and was more important for us…

What does that say?

It sometimes felt the 4-2-3-1 was a 4-2-1-3 and the space was full up for the little midfield maestro to explore.

All in all, Sneijder was my MOTM. His killer pass on Van Persie in the first half deserved better, but Van Persie’s left foot abandoned him.

I personally don’t think Robin was shite. He actually played very well, again: linking up well in the first half and positioning himself wonderfully all the time. It is just the dreaded pulling of the trigger that went awry.

What will Bert do now?

Well, don’t expect too many changes. He will say: “We played well. We simply didn’t score.”

This image says it all..

And thus, I think Bert will change nothing. Subbing Van Persie now means losing him for the tournament. I’d start the exact same way against Germany.

The changes Bert needs to make are in midfield and defense though. Not upfront.

Our forwards will need to pressure better without the ball. That is a given.

But we need to keep the field smaller in possession. Wide, yes, but the defense needs to push up! At times, the distance between the creative 5 and the holding 5 was huge! I’d prefer Raf van der Vaart over Nigel de Jong anyday. Or even Strootman. I hope Mathijsen will be fit for Germany as Vlaar tends to keep the field too long.

Also, our full backs need to push up more. Van der Wiel was atrocious. Despite Willems’ mistakes here and there, I think he is da Man for the job. I wouldn’t sub him.

So, let’s look at the others:

Poland played well. Like Holland. Taking the game to the weaker Greeks, but forgetting to score. The Greek battled their way back into it and Group A looks like a lively group.

Russia wasn’t tested by the Czechs and the main problem Big Dick has with them is to get some consistency. They won this, they might win the next one, but Russia will most likely have an off day at some state and go back home.

Portugal can play football if they decide to do so. They have this sleezy counter attacking gameplan in their dna and as long as they play like this they will be depending on the opponent. They should have played more adventurous. I’m truly impressed with Coentrao, the Real left back. Great player!

Germany looked like Holland in the World Cup. Playing 4-2-3-1. Struggling to create. Ozil was mediocre in the first half, but very good coming from the left side. Podolski was invisible and Muller was struggling too, but they had luck on their side. They didn’t deserve it, but they did get it.

I think it’s about time Holland shows them who’s boss!

Afellay said he felt Oranje was bossing the game. “We created so much. It did resemble some games we played with Barcelona. What it is…concentration, luck, sharpness… no idea…”

Skipper Van Bommel was terrible down. “I don’t know what to say. I’m knackered. The humidity got to us too. But that was not the reason for this defeat. Even that handball, we can’t blame anyone. We had 5 big chances to score and we didn’t score. Simple as that.”

Sneijder: “We all worked hard, and we did what we could to bring our forwards in to position. If they don’t score, it’s game over. We know we would give opportunities away. At this level, the opponent will always get one or two chances. The point is, that we simply need to score more. And we failed. Now we simply need to win the remaining games. Hard, but doable.”

Robben: “I’m sure the Danes pinch themselves still. How could they have won this. I don’t think our loss was a disgrace. We played too good for that. It was more a miracle. And a total disappointment for us… But, we need to regroup and focus on winning all our other matches.”

Netherlands World Cup Blog RSS Feed

Comments

Displaying the most recent 25 comments from a total of 265 comments.

Read the rest of the comments

By steam cleaning middlesex nj | July 5th, 2012 at 2:45 am

I wanted to send a remark to be able to say thanks to you for those great hints you are giving out on this site. My incredibly long internet look up has now been recognized with reasonable information to talk about with my close friends. I would believe that many of us readers are undeniably fortunate to dwell in a remarkable network with very many perfect individuals with interesting concepts. I feel truly fortunate to have seen your entire webpage and look forward to tons of more brilliant times reading here. Thanks a lot once again for a lot of things.

Posted from United States

By istanbul escort | July 5th, 2012 at 5:21 am

Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

By Hawaiian Kona Coffee Online | July 6th, 2012 at 12:32 pm

I cannot thank you enough for the article post.Much thanks again. Cool.

By Red Wine Online Best Red Wine | July 6th, 2012 at 3:27 pm

I appreciate you sharing this blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

By Birthday Card with Photo | July 6th, 2012 at 10:54 pm

Enjoyed every bit of your article.Really thank you! Want more.

By Happy Birthday Photo Cards | July 6th, 2012 at 10:54 pm

Thank you ever so for you blog post.Much thanks again. Awesome.

By Regumate Horses | July 7th, 2012 at 1:34 am

Major thanks for the article post.Thanks Again. Want more.

By Simplicef for Dogs | July 7th, 2012 at 1:34 am

Thanks so much for the post.Much thanks again. Awesome.

By 3D Universal Glasses | July 7th, 2012 at 9:03 pm

Hey, thanks for the blog article.Much thanks again. Fantastic.

By Cheap Bulova Watches | July 8th, 2012 at 2:10 pm

I think this is a real great blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.

By Best King Quilt | July 9th, 2012 at 4:30 am

Im thankful for the article.Really thank you! Keep writing.

By Zarifa | July 9th, 2012 at 7:05 am

Gasteroplix I think most couples feel the need to satsfiy others when planning their wedding but would rather do something else! Its a tricky one. At the end of the day its your own wedding and you should be able to do what you want. A bit controversial! And lets not get into the amount of money you need to spend on doing what you didn’t want anyway!! Your crochet at the engagement party sounds brilliant! A lovely thing for people to remember you by!

By Reverse Email | July 9th, 2012 at 11:44 am

Fantastic article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.

By Tuna Salad | July 9th, 2012 at 2:10 pm

Muchos Gracias for your article.Really thank you! Really Great.

By People Search Engine | July 9th, 2012 at 4:37 pm

Im thankful for the post.Really looking forward to read more.

By sesli chat | July 11th, 2012 at 4:30 am

If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

By seslo | July 11th, 2012 at 4:25 pm

Anyone here?

By sesli chat | July 13th, 2012 at 7:01 pm

By bayan escort | July 14th, 2012 at 5:49 am

Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

By bayan escort siteleri | July 14th, 2012 at 3:41 pm

Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

By sesli chat | July 15th, 2012 at 9:27 pm

The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

By bayan escort | July 17th, 2012 at 11:02 am

The new Zune browser is surprisingly good,but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

By bayan escort bursa | July 17th, 2012 at 12:17 pm

By Josh Iida | July 25th, 2012 at 5:24 am

By http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lc3t0udQaDU | July 25th, 2012 at 11:49 pm

Comments are closed