Sneijder leads, the team hunts…

June 2nd, 2008 | By: Jan | 10 Comments »

Oranje plays it’s best football whenever the opponent’s possession is turned around. Last Sunday, Wesley Sneijder again claimed the lead role against Wales.

It was after 25 minutes or so in the first half, when Wesley Sneijder tried to connect with Ruud van Nistelrooy with gestures and yells. It was clear that he instructed his Real Madrid partner to fall back a bit to create more space for the moment Oranje would turn around. It was a crucial telltale moment. Holland is feverishly looking for the right moment and spot to re-possess the ball and out play their opponent. And Wesley Sneijder is the leader in this quest. The Real Madrid midfielder determines the moment of the hunt, so to speak.

It’s clear after three warm up games, that Oranje is most dangerous when it can counter. Whenever the attack of the opponent is halted, the skills of Oranje stand out. All opportunities that Oranje had, came forth from so-called turn around moments.

Holland scored a beauty against Denmark, with five one-touch moments by five different players. Oranje found the space to execute their lethal counter because the Danes lost possession. The first goal against Wales was also scored, when Oranje successfully stopped them from marching up to Van der Sar.

It’s ironic, really, because since the 1970s, Oranje wants to dominate and play the opponent to pieces with fast-paced positioning play. As such, Holland doesn’t really play counter-football, it’s just that most opportunities occur when the team gets the chance to counter-attack.

Snijeder: “In those situations you can see who quickly we can move out of our tight positions and with what speed we can get into the opponent’s box.” Still, most players don’t want to play more counter-football. “No, we have too many great players to just sit back and absorb pressure,” reacts Robben. “Look at Manchester United, or Zenith St Petersburg. Teams that can counter as the best. Man United won the CL with counter-attacks, but you wouldn’t call them “counter-teams”. Sometimes, you intend to dominate, but if it doesn’t work and you can score from a counter-attack…fine, right?”

Robben lectures on: “I think this is the way for us to go. Playing dominantly on the side of the opponent is in our DNA. I don’t think we should now call it counter-attacking play. AC Milan, in their golden days, played very tight when they lost possession, but when they had the ball, they fanned out and dominated the game. We need to play different styles within one match.”

ORanje wants to be able to play with the moment and spot where it puts pressure on the opponent. Sometimes, you want to pin them down at the edge of their box, in other situations, you allow them space till the middle line. “You want to keep the opponent guessing,” says Dirk Kuyt. “In today’s game, most goals are scored right after the other guys lost possession. In the days of Cruyff and Van Hanegem, Oranje could have long build up play. Sometimes, the opponent didn’t touch the ball for minutes. And then, papapapap, the free man was found and GOAL. Same with Van Gaal’s Ajax. But nowadays, it’s hard to win matches like that. I think you need two teams, so to speak. One tactics when they have the ball, and another tactics for when they lose possession.”

Kuyt knows what he is saying. He has played right midfielder, right full back, right midfielder and goal scorer for Liverpool. And all in one match!

It seems like an irrelevant detail, but the place where the ball is repossessed is also very important. Last week, the Oranje players were unhappy with some of these elements and wanted a team meeting to discuss this element in depth. Sneijder: “Those are very indepth talks. We use video material and discuss different situations in the game. Sometimes, a player decides to allow an opponent space to pass or to keep possession, where more pressure would be a better option. Or the other way around. Hunting and pressuring by one or two players won’t work either. We need to do this as a team. But, against Denmark it was better already and against Wales you could tell in several situations that we’re growing fast.”

The Madrid midfielder is the right man to signal the team for the hunt. “Great that he does,” says Kuyt. “A matter of reading the game. Wesley is dominant and likes to lead.”

Edwin van der Sar sort of put every in their place with his own ideas. “Listen, when we finally possess the ball and create a chance, it would help enormously if we also score! We do get lots of opportunities, but we don’t score enough, relatively speaking. I saw it against Denmark and again against Wales. We had more chances to score in those games and we should benefit more. We haven’t scored enough in the last two years, is my humble opinion. We need more of the “do or die” mentality in the box. Like “this is my only chance, I have to score this one’. We need to take that attitude to the EC, than that would help a lot.”



Related Posts



Subscribe
 

rss icon Netherlands World Cup RSS Feed

Print
Print this article
Share
del.icio.us:Sneijder leads, the team hunts... digg:Sneijder leads, the team hunts... newsvine:Sneijder leads, the team hunts... reddit:Sneijder leads, the team hunts... fark:Sneijder leads, the team hunts... Y!:Sneijder leads, the team hunts... stumbleupon:Sneijder leads, the team hunts...

Comments
Username By sphinx | June 2nd, 2008 at 5:14 am
top comment
cornercorner

counter attack..it’s the only game delvering effectiveness nowadays.
So pleased to hear the fact what we badly need to accept now.
I watched two friendly games our good friends Portugals and Swisses humbled by italy and germany. Our friends opt an agresssive pressing game against well experienced opponents and have the results desreved.
The gib guns just stay back wait for their mistake and take the opportunity effectively.
C.ronaldo just running like a hopeless kid..what a pity.
all we have to focus is our efficieny on scoring. it worried me alot, we need 10 chances to score once!
hope Basten wouldn’t be stupid like Scholary to paly a pressing game with Italy.

Posted from Australia Australia

cornercorner
Username By richard | June 2nd, 2008 at 8:37 am
top comment
cornercorner

Thanks for a very interesting article. It DOES seem that counter-attacking in transition is the ideal way to score these days! I see teams control the ball, I watch buildups with fascination–always wondering how the team with the ball is going to beat a defense with all its men back. And guess what? They almost never do! Buildups and ball control are part of football, but the game reminds me of ice hockey so much–lots of offensive talent but few scores unless one individual makes a magnificent play. So the whole point of this article makes great sense to me.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By Caleb | June 2nd, 2008 at 9:44 am
top comment
cornercorner

The article has a good point, but I don’t think we should turn our game into a counter attacking game. We can still play our creative, dominating play, but look for the quick counter when the other team turns it over.

Stefan – Playing counter attacking football doesn’t necessarily need a good defense, just a team that is able to defend well as a team. We often recover the ball with our midfielders and then we are set for a good counter. But I agree, with our defense it’s still dangerous.

Posted from Canada Canada

cornercorner
Username By Rob | June 2nd, 2008 at 10:28 am
top comment
cornercorner

I agree – most teams seem to be using the counter attack effectively nowadays. I think the key is to try to dominate possession and when that isn’t working, be ready to counter. Oranje can do this as well as any team – there’s great passers everywhere, and in Robben a guy who can pick the ball up and run from the halfway line, as he did in the World Cup. Van Persie would undoubtedly add to the counter attacking potential too.

The funny thing is that when Oranje aren’t counter attacking, we find it very difficult to break through the opponent. As soon as they come onto us, we can pick them off. Maybe our perceived “weak defence” could work to our advantage and make teams commit more than they should?

Posted from Japan Japan

cornercorner
Username By Jan | June 2nd, 2008 at 4:55 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Great points, all. I think Holland plays more counter-attack than we realize. The successful domination play was seen in 74 and 98 but in 1988 we also played more counter attacking football. It’s been said by Sneijder and others that “we” don’t want to play counter attack as a standard game play, but that in turn around situations we’re more likely to find space and therefore have more chances to outplay the opponent. Which makes sense, coz they are out of position already (defensively speaking). As I said before: AC Milan played this game in the days of Gullit, Rijkaard and Van Basten. In ball possession they played 3-3-4, if they lost possession, it was 5-4-1 with Van Basten as only striker. Even Gullit fell back to support midfield. The harmonica they called it. When the opponent built up on the left, the Milan team would “tilt” their positions and press to that side, making the playing field smaller. When they gained the ball back, they would spread out like a harmonica, making the opponent dizzy…

Posted from Australia Australia

cornercorner
Username By Miguel Rosado | June 2nd, 2008 at 11:53 pm
top comment
cornercorner

I really liked what Edwin said about adopting the “do or die” mentality and I totally agree with him. Italy is known for doing that, they wait and wait but when they have 1 opportunity they take it so Holland has to adopt this mentality right away!!!.

cornercorner
Username By Caleb | June 3rd, 2008 at 8:57 am
top comment
cornercorner

Jan – do you mean harmonica or do you mean accordian? Sounds more like an accordian :-)

Posted from Canada Canada

cornercorner
Username By Peter vdL | June 3rd, 2008 at 9:10 am
top comment
cornercorner

Accordian in Dutch is Harmonika =) Same in German… Danish…

Posted from Germany Germany

cornercorner
Username By Jan | June 3rd, 2008 at 9:33 am
top comment
cornercorner

@Caleb, you’re right. Thanks for pointing that out Peter. I saw footage from AC Milan taken from above the pitch and it was awesome how it worked, but…Sacchi had the players every day to work with and perfect it. Van Basten doesn’t have that luxury.

Posted from Australia Australia

cornercorner
Username By ferenc | June 3rd, 2008 at 9:46 am
top comment
cornercorner

but sacchi was one of marco’s masters:-) (johan,rinus,capello – he had very good teachers)

Posted from Hungary Hungary

cornercorner


Comments are closed


 
Go to WCB Homepage




Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for World Cup Blog?
Email tips[at]worldcupblog[dot]org

Netherlands Club Football News

More Europe Blogs

Monthly Archives

closer
World Cup Blog