The Humbug - an Overview
The media jumped on van Basten in this period, seemingly happy that at last they found something they could use against him. As if his sainthood suddenly stopped protecting him. Polls were organised by serious newspapers and tv programs: should van Basten step down, yes or no?
After a few days, and after mostly all players and pundits reacted almost flabbergasted on this ridiculous situation, the humbug died down… The match against Bulgary took most vicious angles and sharp edges from the discussion. VI, the Dutch football magazine published a survey under all Eredivisie coaches, who all proclaimed their support for MvB and their understanding for his behaviour in this situation.
In earlier publications, the chairman of the Dutch Federation expressed his bewilderment on the fact that suddenly the nation turned against MvB.
A quick rundown of the situation:
MvB showed a peculiar way of selecting players for Oranje from day one. He picked young talented no-name players over big guns like Seedorf and Kluivert. The nation was pleased with this; most people had enough of the moviestars, as they were called. And MvB brought home the bacon in the qualification for WC06 so no one really cared. However, MvB did express his dissatisfaction with one player seemed to be at this peak, Mark van Bommel. After another dissapointing match, MvB declared he didn’t need van Bommel anymore. Hasta la Vista baby.
Just before the WC, Marco accepted Bommel back in the group (who had by now changed clubs, from PSV to Barcelona and would later that month win the CL) and surprised the nation by ignoring Makaay, Davids and Seedorf for the WC, although van der Vaart wasn’t fit and our other midfielders did not excell.
However, the nation expected nothing less than a title in Germany. And MvB and Oranje couldn’t deliver. 30 minutes of good play and one goal against S&M, again 30 minutes of good play (and two goals, and a lot of luck) against IC, forgettable football against Argentina (both already qualified for the 2nd group matches) and a shamefull match against Portugal (with a disgrace of a referee and some bad luck for Cocu, Kuyt and van Persie).
And in the meantime, a huge clash between Marco van Basten and Ruud van Nistelrooy.
After the WC, van Bommel left Barcelona for Bayern Munich and Van the Man left Manchester for Madrid. In that phase, MvB didn’t pick them for the friendly against Ireland and the two first Euro 08 qualifiers.
After two of our strikers got injured (Huntelaar, Vennegoor) and our midfield needed some more power (Maduro and van der Vaart out), MvB called upon Mark and Ruud again. Mark’s message was plain and clear: I won’t play for Oranje when you’re the boss! Ruud was willing to patch it up with Marco but the two got in a huge row over the phone (again) and decided it was too early… No Mark and no Ruud against Bulgary (1-1 draw after a very good match in difficult circumstances) and Albania (2-1 win after an ok first half and a dreadful second half), in other words…
And I mustn’t forget that Marco did admit that maybe it would have been a wiser thing in retrospect for him to have called Mark and Ruud after the WC and explain to them why he didn’t call on them for the first post-WC matches.
The professional analysts (ex-players, ex-team managers, coaches, etc) seem to be consistent in their conclusions:
1. Yes, it’s a shame both players are not longer part of the squad
2. Yes, MvB may have made some communication and man-management errors
3. It is MvB’s right and prerogative to select the players he feels best for the job
4. We can all have different opinions, but it is still his responsibility
5. MvB will never favour guys he likes or axe players he personally doesn’t like
6. With Mark and Ruud, Holland did not excel at the WC06
7. Apparently, Mark and Ruud feel they should be beyond criticism; MvB feels differently
8. Mark van Bommel’s timing to quit is somewhat odd, he should’ve thrown the towel after not being selected against Ireland
9. Mark and Ruud let the team and the nation down
Your turn again…
Related Posts
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
|
Comments


professional anlaysts showed much more understanding to Basten than the whole nation. Yes it is natural, Jan.
But they also have to understand why people turned against him.
The nation has shared patience and understanding to his activities up to a limit,I thought.
People did’nt blame him for not calling up Davids, Seedorf and Cluivert. No complaints on telling he doesn’t need Bommel any more.
But it’s really hard to understand why JVH not VNS, why Lanzaart not Seedorf or Davids especially at dying moments like knock out round against Portugals.
Team selection is a coach’s responsibility, that is very true, but how could a nation agree with a manager when he kick out all good players and stick to below pars, team work is lousy and results are unsatisfactory.
People’s judgements base more on the quality and results of tem rather than their personal dealings.
Simply nation showed more sympathy on Ruud and Bommel than their egoistic coach. the are human beings. Basten can’t put the blames to the players not want to play for him. If he ational team down, simply it’s him not any others.
What does it mean by, leadership and responsibility? and
Posted from
Myanmar




1. yes its a shame, its a shame cause both would be a great asset to the team
2. vanBasten sure has some lack of people-management qualities, thats to bad cause thats one of his MAIN responsibilities(?)
3.sure thats the case
4.glad we can have an opinion, otherwise this blog would not have been
5. not so sure about that one, dont thinks its a thing about personal feelings think its about expectations from players from Ajax (youth) and players who play in other clubs
6. true, cause vanBommel was to stressed out cause of vanBasten, vanNistelrooy never had a decent ball all WC (exc. one against Ivo. which he scored)
7.not true: they feel huniliated (and rightly so!)
8. no, nobody asked him before so no need for him to say no earlier
9.no, vanBasten did
greetz
Posted from
Netherlands


Comments are closed
Send Your Tips!
Email tips[at]worldcupblog[dot]org
Netherlands Club Football News
- Heerenveen to attack at will
- Het Legioen!
- make it a fortress
- Heracles Almelo at Philips Stadion
- The Danko Lazović "situation"
More Europe Blogs
France World Cup Blog
720 Articles | 8,365 Comments
Croatia World Cup Blog
170 Articles | 1,716 Comments
Czech Republic World Cup Blog
196 Articles | 319 Comments
England World Cup Team Blog
702 Articles | 2,331 Comments
Germany World Cup Blog Blog
442 Articles | 2,821 Comments
Italy World Cup Blog
440 Articles | 15,731 Comments
Netherlands World Cup Blog
1,518 Articles | 15,936 Comments
Poland World Cup Blog
250 Articles | 1,735 Comments
Portugal World Cup Blog
425 Articles | 6,468 Comments
Serbia World Cup Team Blog
154 Articles | 808 Comments
Spain World Cup Blog
197 Articles | 1,516 Comments
Sweden World Cup Blog
150 Articles | 318 Comments
Switzerland World Cup Blog
216 Articles | 327 Comments
Ukraine World Cup Team Blog
98 Articles | 686 Comments
Greece World Cup Blog
96 Articles | 47 Comments
Russia World Cup Blog
44 Articles | 109 Comments
Scotland World Cup Team Blog
83 Articles | 61 Comments
Ireland World Cup Team Blog
14 Articles | 8 Comments
Norway World Cup Team Blog
3 Articles | 5 Comments
Turkey World Cup Blog
32 Articles | 272 Comments
Romania World Cup Blog
66 Articles | 275 Comments
Austria World Cup Blog
101 Articles | 113 Comments
Denmark World Cup Team Blog
5 Articles | 19 Comments
Albania World Cup Team Blog
4 Articles | 8 Comments
Belgium World Cup Team Blog
45 Articles | 46 Comments
Wales World Cup Team Blog
45 Articles | 9 Comments
Bosnia World Cup Team Blog
5 Articles | 3 Comments
Monthly Archives
World 










