Comments on: Marco drops Ruud and Bommel

By: goose

goose — Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:34:09 +0000

Maduro is hurt (but he should not be in Oranje at all!!, hes slow and plays like an old lady..),
really have no more faith in Marco anymore, he lost the plot..

instead of giving Ruud and Mark the change to prove themself this season he closes the door on them.. Marco just hates everything not coming from Ajax.. hes duty as coach is to let players play their best, not fucking them up like he fucked up vanBommel and vanNistelrooy.. they play for the biggest clubs in Europe(e.a.the world) sorry Marco, would be better if you’d go away and learned how to be a coach..

greetz

By: Jan

Jan — Sat, 12 Aug 2006 17:07:22 +0000

Maduro is rested. He had a long period of no-holidays. Last year the

By: ferenc

ferenc — Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:36:12 +0000

i think marco is the problem…. no van bommel, no rvn, no maduro, no stekelenburg, (no seedorf: he’s the same age as landzaat)…

you’re right: the midfield doesn’t look very strong

By: ziqilau

ziqilau — Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:44:20 +0000

I really don’t understand Marco at all.

By: ziqilau

ziqilau — Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:42:22 +0000

where’s Maduro?

It seems that the problem focus on forward .

otherwise,the actual problem is the weak midfield.

what a pit!

By: Roy

Roy — Sat, 12 Aug 2006 06:30:31 +0000

I’m in agreement here – can’t believe the coach is setting VN aside again. I think it was a mistake in the WC game against Portugal, and I only hope it isn’t a mistake now. Guess we’ll find out in a few more days…

By: ferenc

ferenc — Sat, 12 Aug 2006 04:42:32 +0000

i would like to see this oranje in the coming 2 years: van der saar – heitinga,boulahrouz(ooijer),vlaar,van bronckhorst(urby) – van bommel(maduro),vdv(sneijder),schaars(hofs)- van persie(castelen),huntelaar(rvn),robben

no landzaat,vennegor of hasselink,etc.

By: Rami

Rami — Sat, 12 Aug 2006 04:11:19 +0000

Greetings to all of you once again.. Jan, Mike and the rest.. Been a while since i last made an appearance. Latest developments (war in Lebanon) really took everyone of us out here by surprise .. and for quite a ride !!

I agree with all of you.. Absolutely do not understand van basten. landzaat is 31 and timmer is 34 as u say.. He defenitely has the wrong players for experience in the squad. I’d prefer van the man on the bench for netherlands no matter how bad he is/might be playing. Unless.. unless VN did not show the coach he was keen on starting as a substitute… Don’t know.

however im excited for urby, schaars and klaas and de jong.. Hope they look promising out there against ireland. where did maduro go ??? why isnt he in the squad??

well we’ll see what happens.. hope vb will start making the right choices.

By: Samuel Knight

Samuel Knight — Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:29:54 +0000

Wat denkt hij?

I know the Dutch are more willing to give their frank opinion of just about anything than any other people on earth, but I don’t think that’s a good idea for Van Baasten to so publicly humilate major players.

Van N, Van Bommel, Davids. Wouldn’t a nice public thank you – and some BS reason why the “chemistry” just doesn’t work be better?

Right now the hottest 3 nederlandse strikers are clearly Robben, van Persie and Klaas-Jan, so that’s who want on the field. But I sure as heck would want the option of hauling Van N off the bench.

Unfortunately, look at Klinsman, he made the hard choices, but he always did it nicely.

By: ferenc

ferenc — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:05:08 +0000

i am totally agree with kervin.

van basten: no comment..:-( kuijt,vennegoor,landzaat instead of ruud,van bommel… and why the 34years old timmer is the second gollie?