Angry van Basten doesn’t blame himself

September 4th, 2006 | By: Jan | 8 Comments »

Bondscoach Marco van Basten tijdens de EK-kwalificatiewedstrijd tegen Luxemburg. Foto AP
As a player, van Basten never liked playing against weak teams. He never reached his best level of play against those team. But, he never played as dreadful as Oranje played last Saturday. “I am dead serious, we should rejoice that we won this game,” was his honest remark after the match.

Van Basten admitted freely that he never had the idea the match was in the bag. “Even after Joris’ goal, I felt it could go horribly wrong. This was horrible. We failed. And I am not going to name names or point at specific players. Every one of them played miserably, with the exception of Van der Sar.”

The Dutch team manager couldn’t see any blame for himself. “I wouldn’t know what I did wrong. I was happy with the preparation for the game. I didn’t see this terrible performance coming…”

Even after the lousy show against Luxembourg, van Basten backed his selection. “It is a pity that I couldn’t make use of some players, obviously,” meaning Robben, van der Vaart, Sneijder, Van Bronckhorst and Boulahrouz. Van Basten doesn’t think he should have selected more experienced players like Seedorf, van Bommel, Davids, Makaay or van Nistelrooy. “No, even after this performance, I think we can perform very well with our group. But tonight was very very bad. I could have taken any one of them off the pitch.”

Van Basten declared right after the match he was disappointed in his players. “And I am also pretty pissed off. We played unbelievably bad. Just unbelievable. Will this have repercussions for some players? That could well be the case!”



Related Posts



Subscribe
 

rss icon Netherlands World Cup RSS Feed

Print
Print this article
Share
del.icio.us:Angry van Basten doesn’t blame himself digg:Angry van Basten doesn’t blame himself newsvine:Angry van Basten doesn’t blame himself reddit:Angry van Basten doesn’t blame himself fark:Angry van Basten doesn’t blame himself Y!:Angry van Basten doesn’t blame himself stumbleupon:Angry van Basten doesn’t blame himself

Comments
Username By goose | September 4th, 2006 at 12:36 pm
top comment
cornercorner

The Dutch team manager couldn’t see any blame for himself. “I wouldn’t know what I did wrong. I was happy with the preparation for the game. I didn’t see this terrible performance coming…”

ofcourse he doenst blame himself, no surprise there… why doenst he understand that it is his responsebelity(?)to pick the starting 11, maybe he should consider chosing different players (like vanBommel, vanNistelrooy, Seedorf, Davids, Makaay)
he told the press he was surprised that this team could play so lousy…WELL IM NOT!!!

this reaction tells it all, vanBasten is arrogant and we all pay for it!!

greetz

WIJ HOUDEN VAN ORANJE…….. MAAR NIET ALS ZE NOG EENS ZON WEDSTRIJD SPELEN

Posted from Netherlands Netherlands

cornercorner
Username By ferenc | September 4th, 2006 at 1:01 pm
top comment
cornercorner

i hope belarus or later roumania will beat the oranje like 3-0 or 4-0 and after this kind of defeat marco should blame himself and select seedorf,van nistelrooij,makaay,van bommel,davids…
for ex. landzaat plays the same role as seedorf or van bommel could – seedorf is one of the best of ac milan,van bommel will be the playmaker of bayern – milan or bayern vesus wigan athletic… only marco thinks that wigan is better
huntelaar is out of form. no problem. ruud or makaay could easily replace him.
and marco should forget vennegoor too – he doesn’t work at all. very mediocre.
janssen? i should laugh…
but even an oranje b-team should beat luxemburg 4-0,5-0. there is no excuse. marco’s selection is very bad.

Posted from Hungary Hungary

cornercorner
Username By Simon | September 4th, 2006 at 6:29 pm
top comment
cornercorner

van Basten is right about not select Seedorf, van Nistelrooy, Makaay, van Bommel and Davids… they are too lazy for a game like this. I dont see why everyone scream so hard after these guys… I mean.. they suck. They have shown it plenty of times; they suck. Sure, van Nistelrooy is a good attacker, Seedorf a good midfielder and Davids as well, but Huntelaar are as good as van Nistelrooy and Seedorf was always lazy in Oranje. Davids sure is a good player and perhaps he should get more calls, but he is a very bad player when it comes down to morale etc… dont even get me started about Makaay, he got the chance so many times without scoring that it is no doubt most trainers would have left him outside the team.

Posted from Sweden Sweden

cornercorner
Username By ferenc | September 4th, 2006 at 7:32 pm
top comment
cornercorner

makaay was almost always substitute playin on the right-wing,etc – he had no chance to prove his talent in the oranje. don’t tell me that landzaat is better than clarence or van bommel. he’s also 30. they don’t suck, van basten’s favourits suck and his ideas (has he any?) don’t work at all.
i didn’t say that huntelaar wasn’t good, he’s very talented but at the moment he’s out of form, and in this case ruud or makaay could replace him. don’t tell me that vennegor is the solution (we saw him and his “talent” against portugal), or even kuijt (he didn’t nothing against portugal – a forward should score first of all).
bad performances,bad selection,oranje looses his style – tell me why marco has so right?
for the facts: with seedorf,davids,etc: wc98, euro 2000, euro 2004 – semi finals
with marco’s beloved landzaat,vennegor,janssen,etc we were eliminated in the second tour of the wc,and probably will qualify for the ec but won’t survive the second tour. i don’t want to see a mediocre oranje,i want a brilliant,dominant,intelligent oranje. with marco it’s impossible – he proved it,because for him he and his image is more important than the team. bad and coward manager.

Posted from Hungary Hungary

cornercorner
Username By Simon | September 4th, 2006 at 9:34 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Coward? Lol. Yeah, thats one way of seeing it..

Posted from Sweden Sweden

cornercorner
Username By Fares | September 4th, 2006 at 9:44 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Guys, think like a coach once …

If you don’t choose Makaay once, do you think he will come back and play one game cuase the other 2 ahead of him are out ..no

After the fight with Davids, do you think they will come back togather ..no way

So better find a replacement against weaker teams so you will have no surprises when playing big teams.

couple of weeks ago Holland killed a weakened Irealand ..but note that this weakend Irealand is better than Lux’g.

I agree that some names don’t desereve to be in the team … but u have to be pateint ..the best is yet to come !!!

I am confident that Holland will put few behind the Bel’russians.

With Khalid and Gio there ..the back line is better … When we have Wesly and Rafa back, it will look better. And Robben ! Van Bommel is out of the game form. He sucks from time to time. Thats why Frank Rijkard sold his home boy … let him prove himself in BM and MVB will welcome him back.

If I am a coach, I will select the best, I will never deselect one becuase he is good. Its also a psycalogial thingy to sit out the best players :

1- to get them work harder
2- to prove you have a word
3- to give the other the chance and make them work hard

— though I am with adding an expereined player for the hell of it. Like Seedorf or Bommel in this game .. strikers we are fine with the replacement. Our weak point is the mid.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By sphinx | September 5th, 2006 at 4:52 pm
top comment
cornercorner

ferenc! I agree with you to say Basten a bad manager.I don’t want to blame him for his way of team selection.As a manager he can architect a team at his way.but he can’t be such stubborn when the perfromance and results prove wrong.Is that rational to expact mid-field domainancy while he wants to f**k off Seedorf, Davids and Bommel for Lanzaart, Schaars and Janssen? Is VoH replacement for Ruud while Hunter is out of form? Is pressing game recommandable when you only have inexperience and inferior players?
Simply i see MVB out of logic.

Posted from Myanmar Myanmar

cornercorner
Username By ferenc | September 5th, 2006 at 5:29 pm
top comment
cornercorner

@sphinx: exactly – at the beginning i said:let’s see him,new coach with new ideas – he had results but not good games. but a wc is not the same as the eliminatories – teams need experienced players (like france,italy and even portugal). he had the possibility,and didn’t choose the above-mentionned guys. and he failed – because we had 20 good minutes against a very weak serbia,20 good minutes and a lots of luck against ivory coast,against argentina it didn’t count at all,but against portugal it was carastrophic because of his tactics. we can say that with marco we lost only 2 games,but the last one counted the most. friendly games doesn’t count at all.
after the wc i koped he would rethink his ideas and trie to be more human more intelligent. and he did the opposite. results don’t prove he’s right.

Posted from Hungary Hungary

cornercorner


Comments are closed


 
Go to WCB Homepage




Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for World Cup Blog?
Email tips[at]worldcupblog[dot]org

Netherlands Club Football News

More Europe Blogs

Monthly Archives

closer
World Cup Blog